Vote Research ToolkitAmerican Bridge 21st Century
Sign in v0.1.0

Roll calls 35264 stored

VoteDateQuestionDescriptionResultY-N
House Vote 125 (1995)1995-02-14On Agreeing to the Amendment HR728: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCHROEDER AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO AUTHORIZE THE USE OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING TO PROTECT ABORTION CLINICS.)Failed164-266
House Vote 124 (1995)1995-02-14On Agreeing to the Amendment HR728: H.R.728 BY MCCOLLUM (R-FL) -- LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCHUMER AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO TRANSFER $7.5 BILLION FROM THE BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR THE "COPS ON THE BEAT" COMMUNITY POLICING PROGRAM; AND TRANSFERS THE REMAINING $2.5 BILLION TO LOCAL CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS.)Failed196-235
House Vote 123 (1995)1995-02-13Committees to Sit during 5 minute Rule for Balance of Week (HOUSE AGREED TO THE ARMEY MOTION THAT ALL COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE AND THEIR SUBCOMMITTEES HAVE PERMISSION TO SIT TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1995, AND THE BALANCE OF THE WEEK DURING PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE UNDER THE FIVE-MINUTE RULE.)Passed220-191
House Vote 122 (1995)1995-02-13On ordering the Previous Question (HOUSE AGREED TO ORDER THE PREVIOUS QUESTION.)Passed222-190
House Vote 121 (1995)1995-02-13On Agreeing to the Amendment HR728: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MFUME AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO MAKE GRANTS TO STATE AND LOCAL COURTS AND GOVERNMENTS FOR PROGRAMS THAT INVOLVE CONTINUING JUDICIAL SUPERVISION OVER OFFENDERS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS WHO ARE NOT VIOLENT OFFENDERS.)Failed160-266
House Vote 120 (1995)1995-02-13On Agreeing to the Amendment HR728: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF BLOCK GRANTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENT OF HIGHWAYS, STREETS OR ROADS.)Failed194-230
House Vote 118 (1995)1995-02-10On Passage HR668: Criminal Alien Deportation Improvements Act of 1995Passed380-20
House Vote 117 (1995)1995-02-10On Passage HR667: Violent Criminal Incarceration ActPassed265-156
House Vote 116 (1995)1995-02-10On Motion to Recommit with Instructions HR667: Violent Criminal Incarceration ActFailed193-227
House Vote 115 (1995)1995-02-10On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCOTT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO DECREASE BY $2.5 BILLION THE TOTAL FUNDING FOR STATE AND REGIONAL PRISON GRANTS.)Failed155-268
House Vote 114 (1995)1995-02-10On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CHAPMAN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO MAKE STATES ELIGIBLE FOR BOTH GENERAL AND "TRUTH IN SENTENCING" PRISON GRANTS RATHER THAN EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER.)Failed176-248
House Vote 113 (1995)1995-02-10On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CARDIN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO REDUCE BY $36 MILLION OVER 5 YEARS THE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRISON GRANTS.)Failed129-295
House Vote 112 (1995)1995-02-10On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT OF NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE THE AUTOMATIC STAY PROVISION RELATING TO RELIEF LAWSUITS BROUGHT BY INMATES.)Failed93-313
House Vote 111 (1995)1995-02-09On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCHUMER AMENDMENT ELIMINATING THE PRISON GRANT PROGRAMS, INCLUDING THE GENERAL PRISON BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND THE TRUTH-IN-SENTENCING INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM; CONSOLIDATING THE VIOLENT OFFENDER AND TRUTH-IN-SENTENCING GRANT PROGRAMS INTO A SINGLE PRISON BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM; PROVIDING THAT EACH STATE WOULD RECEIVE A PRISON BLOCK GRANT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VIOLENT CRIMES AMONG THE STATES; PROVIDING THAT THE BLOCK GRANT WOULD BE FUNDED AT THE SAME ANNUAL LEVEL AS THE TOTAL STATE FUNDING PROVIDED IN THE 1994 CRIME CONTROL ACT; AND PROVIDING THAT STATES THAT FAILED TO USE THEIR ALLOCATED GRANT FUNDING WITHIN TWO YEARS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO REFUND UNUSED MONEYS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR LATER DISTRIBUTION TO STATES.)Failed179-251
House Vote 110 (1995)1995-02-09On Agreeing to the Amendment HR667: H.R.667 BY MCCOLLUM (R-FL) -- VIOLENT CRIMINAL INCARCERATION ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE REJECTED THE CHAPMAN AMENDMENT PROHIBITING THE EXPENDITURE OF ANY PRISON GRANT FUNDING, INCLUDING FUNDING FOR THE GENERAL PRISON GRANT PROGRAM AND THE TRUTH-IN-SENTENCING INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM, UNTIL AND UNLESS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CERTIFIES THAT AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT OF STATES MEET TRUTH-IN-SENTENCING REQUIREMENTS.)Failed169-261
House Vote 109 (1995)1995-02-08On Passage HR729: Effective death penalty act of 1995Passed297-132
House Vote 108 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR729: (HOUSE AGREED TO THE SMITH OF TEXAS AMENDMENT THAT PROVIDES THAT THE AUTOMATIC STAY OF EXECUTION PROVISIONS WILL TERMINATE UPON COMPLETION OF STATE COURT REVIEW UNLESS THE PETITIONER HAS MADE A SUBSTANTITAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A FEDERAL RIGHT.)Agreed to241-189
House Vote 107 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR729: (HOUSE REJECTED THE FIELDS OF LOUISIANA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO ADD LANGUAGE TO PERMIT JURIES, IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE THE BILL NOW REQUIRES THE DEALTH PENALTY, TO RECOMMEND A SENTENCE OF DEATH OR OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE.)Failed139-291
House Vote 106 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR729: (HOUSE AGREED TO THE COX AMENDMENT THAT ESTABLISHES A RULE OF DEFERENCE TO STATE COURTS SO THAT FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ARE ENTERTAINING HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS FROM STATE INMATES WOULD BE REQUIRED TO CONSIDER WHETHER THE CLAIMANT RECEIVED A FULL AND FAIR ADJUDICATION OF THEIR COMPLAINT.)Agreed to291-140
House Vote 105 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR729: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT OF NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PERMIT STATE PRISONERS SENTENCED TO DEATH OR TO PRISON TO FILE A SECOND FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION IF IT IS SHOWN, THROUGH NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, THAT THE PERSON WAS INNOCENT AND PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACQUITED HAD THE EVIDENCE BEEN PRESENTED AT TRIAL.)Failed151-280
House Vote 104 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR729: H.R.729 BY MCCOLLUM (R-FL) -- EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCHUMER AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO ENCOURAGE STATES TO PROVIDE COMPETENT COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES DURING THE INITIAL TRIAL PHASE.)Failed149-282
House Vote 103 (1995)1995-02-08On Passage HR666: Exclusionary Rule Reform Act of 1995Passed289-142
House Vote 102 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR666: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SERRANO AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT SEARCHES OR SEIZURES CARRIED OUT BY OR UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.)Failed103-330
House Vote 101 (1995)1995-02-08On Agreeing to the Amendment HR666: H.R.666 BY MCCOLLUM (R-FL) -- EXCLUSIONARY RULE REFORM ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE VOLKMER AMENDMENT THAT EXEMPTS SEARCHES AND SEIZURES CARRIED OUT BY OR UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS FROM A RELAXATION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.)Agreed to228-198
House Vote 100 (1995)1995-02-08On Approving the Journal (HOUSE APPROVED THE JOURNAL OF TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1995.)Passed346-69
House Vote 99 (1995)1995-02-07On Agreeing to the Amendment HR666: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE PROVISIONS APPLYING THE "GOOD FAITH" EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE TO WARRANTLESS SEARCHES; AND TO REPLACE IT WITH THE TEXT OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.)Failed121-303
House Vote 98 (1995)1995-02-07On Agreeing to the Amendment HR666: H.R.666 BY MCCOLLUM (R-FL) -- EXCLUSIONARY RULE REFORM ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE REJECTED THE CONYERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO LIMIT AND CODIFY THE "GOOD FAITH" EXCEPTION TO SEARCHES AND SEIZURES WITH WARRANTS LATER TO BE FOUND INVALID; AND TO ENACT THE CURRENT LIMITED "GOOD FAITH" EXCEPTION FOR SEARCHES IN WHICH EVIDENCE WAS NOT EXCLUDED IF IT WAS RETAINED IN A "GOOD FAITH" RELIANCE ON A STATUTE, WHICH WAS LATER HELD TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.)Failed138-291
House Vote 97 (1995)1995-02-07On Passage HR665: Victim Restitution Act of 1995Passed431-0
House Vote 96 (1995)1995-02-07On motion to table the appeal HRES57: In regard to the financial assistance plan for MexicoPassed288-143
House Vote 95 (1995)1995-02-06On Passage HR2: Line Item Veto ActPassed294-134
House Vote 94 (1995)1995-02-06On Motion to Recommit with Instructions HR2: Line Item Veto ActFailed185-241
House Vote 93 (1995)1995-02-06On agreeing to the Substitute Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE STENHOLM AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE, AMENDING THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL ACT OF 1974 TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROPOSED RESCISSIONS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY WHICH PASSED THE HOUSE IN 1994; AND, ENABLE THE PRESIDENT TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE USE OF A LINE-ITEM VETO PROCEDURE OR EXPEDITED RESCISSION PROCEDURES WHEN PROPOSING RESCISSIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS OR VETOES OF TARGETED TAX BENEFITS.)Failed156-266
House Vote 92 (1995)1995-02-06On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO ALLOW THE PRESIDENT TO RESCIND ANY PROVISION WHICH HE DETERMINES WOULD YIELD AT LEAST 20 PERCENT OF ITS BENEFIT TO THE TOP ONE PERCENT OF INCOME EARNERS.)Failed144-280
House Vote 91 (1995)1995-02-06On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE ORTON AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO DEFINE "DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY" TO INCLUDE THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO FUTURE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR WHICH FUNDS ARE NOT APPROPRIATED IN ADVANCE.)Failed65-360
House Vote 90 (1995)1995-02-03On agreeing to the amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WISE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT RESCISSIONS PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT MUST BE VOTED ON BY CONGRESS UNDER EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION PROCEDURES, AND THAT REPEALS OF "TARGETED TAX BENEFITS" PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT ALSO MUST BE VOTED ON BY CONGRESS UNDER EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION PROCEDURES AND WOULD ONLY BECOME EFFECTIVE IF APPROVED BY THE HOUSE AND SENATE.)Failed167-246
House Vote 89 (1995)1995-02-03On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SPRATT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXPAND THE TYPES OF PROVISIONS IN TAX BILLS THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN PROPOSE BE REPEALED UNDER HIS NEW LINE-ITEM VETO AUTHORITY.)Failed175-243
House Vote 88 (1995)1995-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE KANJORSKI AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS WILL TERMINATE AFTER FIVE YEARS.)Failed153-258
House Vote 87 (1995)1995-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SKELTON AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PRESIDENT MAY NOT INCLUDE IN A SPECIAL MESSAGE ANY RESCISSION OF MORE THAN $50 MILLION OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY FOR ANY PROGRAM, PROJECT, OR ACTIVITY WITHIN THE MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE.)Failed52-362
House Vote 86 (1995)1995-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SLAUGHTER AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE LANGUAGE WHICH WOULD EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF "TARGETED TAX BENEFIT" TO MEAN ANY PROVISION OF A REVENUE ACT WHICH HAS THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF PROVIDING A BENEFIT IN THE FORM OF A DIFFERENT TREATMENT TO A PARTICULAR TAXPAYER OR A LIMITED CLASS OF TAXPAYERS.)Failed196-231
House Vote 85 (1995)1995-02-02On Agreeing to the Amendment HR2: H.R.2 BY CLINGER (R-PA) -- LINE-ITEM VETO ACT (CONTRACT WITH AMERICA) (HOUSE REJECTED THE MORAN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT THE JUDICIAL BRANCH FROM THE SCOPE OF THE LINE-ITEM VETO.)Failed119-309
House Vote 84 (1995)1995-02-01On Passage HR400: Anaktuvuk Pass Land Exchange and Wilderness Redesignation ActPassed427-0
House Vote 83 (1995)1995-02-01On Passage HR5: Unfunded Mandate Reform ActPassed360-74
House Vote 82 (1995)1995-02-01On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MORAN AMENDMENT, IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE, THE "FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REFORM ACT".)Failed152-278
House Vote 81 (1995)1995-02-01On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE DOGGETT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE BILL WOULD CEASE TO BE EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 3, 2000, AND THEN WOULD REQUIRE CONGRESSIONAL REAUTHORIZATION IN ORDER FOR ITS PROVISIONS TO REMAIN IN EFFECT.)Failed145-283
House Vote 80 (1995)1995-02-01On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SANDERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO REQUIRE THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (CBO) TO PREPARE A HEALTH CARE IMPACT STATEMENT WHICH WOULD PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE HEALTH CARE COSTS THAT WOULD RESULT IF THE PARTICULAR MANDATE IS NOT ENACTED OR ENFORCED; AND A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MANDATE BENEFITS INCLUDING BENEFITS TO HUMAN HEALTH, WELFARE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT.)Failed152-254
House Vote 79 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MORAN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO CHANGE LANGUAGE DEFINING A "FEDERAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL MANDATE" SO THAT IT WOULD NOT INCLUDE ANY PROVISION WHICH WOULD APPLY AN ENFORCEABLE MANDATE EQUALLY TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR; AND TO PROVIDE THAT A POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION CONTAINING UNFUNDED MANDATES COULD NOT BE INVOKED IN THE CASE OF PROVISIONS THAT APPLY EQUALLY TO THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS.)Failed143-285
House Vote 78 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE BEILENSON AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE PROVISIONS ESTABLISHING A POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION CONTAINING UNFUNDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL MANDATES SO THAT A POINT OF ORDER WOULD APPLY ONLY TO LEGISLATION FOR WHICH THE REQUIRED CBO COST ESTIMATE HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.)Failed138-291
House Vote 77 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MINK AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT LEGISLATION AFFECTING ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS IN WHICH STATES PARTICIPATE VOLUNTARILY WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS IMPOSING A FEDERAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL MANDATE.)Failed121-310
House Vote 76 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WAXMAN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO SPECIFY THAT PROPOSED LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO PREVENT FRAUD AND ABUSE, OR TO INCREASE FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE OR LOCAL PROGRAMS, SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS IMPOSING UNFUNDED MANDATES.)Failed153-275
House Vote 75 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE COOLEY AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE LANGUAGE WHICH EXEMPTS LEGISLATION REAUTHORIZING EXISTING LAWS FROM POINT OF ORDER PROVISIONS SO LONG AS THAT REAUTHORIZATION DOES NOT INCREASE NET DIRECT COSTS TO STATE, LOCAL, OR TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.)Failed146-287
House Vote 74 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE HALL OF OHIO AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN LOW-INCOME ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS WOULD BE CONSIDERED FEDERAL MANDATES, MAKING LEGISLATION REDUCING THEIR FUNDING SUBJECT TO A POINT OF ORDER AS AN UNFUNDED MANDATE, EVEN IF THOSE PROGRAMS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED IN THE FUTURE, SUCH AS WITH THE INCORPORATION INTO A BLOCK GRANT AS PART OF ANY FORTHCOMING WELFARE REFORM.)Failed144-289
House Vote 73 (1995)1995-01-31On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE COLLINS OF ILLINOIS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO CHANGE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PROVISIONS TO TEN DAYS AFTER ENACTMENT, RATHER THAN OCTOBER 1, 1995, AS CURRENTLY PROVIDED.)Failed181-250
House Vote 72 (1995)1995-01-31On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE FIELDS OF LOUISIANA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR THE EDUCATION OR SAFETY OF STUDENTS IN ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.)Failed135-282
House Vote 71 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE VENTO EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO LIFE THREATENING PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY MATTERS.)Failed109-308
House Vote 70 (1995)1995-01-30On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE PELOSI AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH A MINIMUM WAGE.)Failed159-260
House Vote 69 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MARTINEZ AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OR THE JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY ACT.)Failed126-296
House Vote 68 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE KANJORSKI AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO MEDICARE.)Failed161-266
House Vote 67 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE BECERRA AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM EXPLOITATION IN THE WORKPLACE.)Failed156-269
House Vote 66 (1995)1995-01-30On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE JACKSON-LEE AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO MEDICAID.)Failed131-295
House Vote 65 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CLAY EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROTECT SCHOOL CHILDREN FROM EXPOSURE TO DANGEROUS CONDITIONS IN SCHOOLS, INCLUDING EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS AND LEAD PAINT.)Failed127-297
House Vote 64 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CLAY EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THOSE, INCLUDING CHILDREN AND DISCOURAGED WORKERS, WHO, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, RECEIVE WELFARE ASSISTANCE.)Failed138-284
House Vote 63 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CLAY EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROTECT THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PERSONS WHO, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, NEED WELFARE ASSISTANCE; OR REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO PROTECTING AGAINST HUNGER OR HOMELESSNESS.)Failed151-277
House Vote 62 (1995)1995-01-30On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE JACKSON-LEE AMENDMENT TO THE CLAY AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO INCLUDE AN EXEMPTION FROM LAWS AND REGULATIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT ADULTS FROM HUNGER OR HOMELESSNESS.)Failed142-285
House Vote 61 (1995)1995-01-30On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE BORSKI AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT ENFORCE OR ESTABLISH LIMITS ON THE INTRODUCTION INTO UNITED STATES WATER OF POLLUTANTS THAT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ACUTE EFFECTS ON HUMAN HEALTH, CANCER, DEVELOPMENTAL MALFORMATION, REPRODUCTIVE DYSFUNCTIONS, NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, GENETIC MUTATIONS OR OTHER CHRONIC EFFECTS ON HUMAN HEALTH WHICH ARE SERIOUS OR IRREVERSIBLE.)Failed162-263
House Vote 60 (1995)1995-01-30on agreeing to the amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE VOLKMER AMENDMENT TO THE BORSKI AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO ADD 5 REPRODUCTIVE DISORDERS TO THE LIST OF HEALTH ILLNESSES AFFECTED BY WATER POLLUTION.)Failed114-312
House Vote 59 (1995)1995-01-30Motion to rise (HOUSE REJECTED THE VOLKMER MOTION THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE.)Failed159-266
House Vote 58 (1995)1995-01-30motion to rise HR5: Unfunded Mandate Reform ActPassed237-181
House Vote 57 (1995)1995-01-30On motion to Limit Debate HR5: Unfunded Mandate Reform ActPassed233-181
House Vote 55 (1995)1995-01-27On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MASCARA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE COLLECTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS.)Failed158-259
House Vote 54 (1995)1995-01-27On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CLAYTON AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO LAWS AND REGULATIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKER SAFETY.)Failed157-262
House Vote 53 (1995)1995-01-27On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: H.R.5 BY CLINGER (R-PA) -- UNFUNDED MANDATE REFORM ACT OF 1995 (CONTRACT WITH AMERICA) (HOUSE REJECTED THE KANJORSKI EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO INVESTOR PROTECTION; THE SAFE AND SOUND OPERATION OF FINANCIAL MARKETS; FEDERALLY INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS; OR THE DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUNDS THAT ENSURE THE DEPOSITS ON MEMBER ACCOUNTS IN THESE DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS OR CREDIT UNIONS.)Failed154-266
House Vote 52 (1995)1995-01-27On Approving the Journal (HOUSE APPROVED THE JOURNAL OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 1995.)Passed310-90
House Vote 51 (1995)1995-01-26On Passage HJRES1: Proposing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution of the United StatesPassed300-132
House Vote 50 (1995)1995-01-26On Motion to Recommit with Instructions HJRES1: Proposing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution of the United StatesFailed184-247
House Vote 49 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: (HOUSE AGREED TO THE SCHAEFER AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE SUPERCEDING THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE, WHILE PROVIDING SIMILAR BALANCED BUDGET PROVISIONS AS THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE, EXCEPT IT DOES NOT REQUIRE A THREE-FIFTHS VOTE TO RAISE TAXES.)Agreed to293-139
House Vote 48 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: (HOUSE REJECTED THE BONIOR AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO REQUIRE THAT THE BUDGET BE BALANCED BY FISCAL YEAR 2002; EXEMPT SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BALANCED BUDGET CALCULATIONS; AND TO NOT REQUIRE SUPERMAJORITY VOTES FOR TAX OR DEBT LIMIT INCREASES.)Failed135-296
House Vote 47 (1995)1995-01-26Motion to Rise (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT OF NORTH CAROLINA MOTION THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT THE RESOLUTION BACK TO THE HOUSE.)Failed79-342
House Vote 46 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: (HOUSE REJECTED THE CONYERS AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO REQUIRE THE ADOPTION OF A STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS WHICH BALANCE; REQUIRE THE PRESIDENT TO SUBMIT A BALANCED BUDGET; EXEMPT SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BALANCED BUDGET CALCULATIONS; AND PROVIDE THAT THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WOULD NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL CONGRESS ADOPTS A SPECIFIC BUDGET PLAN.)Failed112-317
House Vote 45 (1995)1995-01-26Motion to rise and strike the resolving clause (HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT OF NORTH CAROLINA MOTION THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE AND REPORT THE RESOLUTION BACK TO THE HOUSE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE RESOLVING CLAUSE BE STRICKEN.)Failed96-331
House Vote 44 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: (HOUSE REJECTED THE WISE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE CAPITAL BUDGET AND REQUIRE THAT THE OPERATING BUDGET BE BALANCED; EXEMPT SOCIAL SECURITY FROM BUDGET CALCULATIONS; AND PERMIT CONGRESS TO WAIVE THE BALANCED BUDGET PROVISIONS IN TIMES OF WAR, MILITARY CONFLICT, OR RECESSION AS DECLARED BY LAW.)Failed138-291
House Vote 43 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: (HOUSE REJECTED THE OWENS AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE SIMILAR BALANCED BUDGET PROVISIONS AS THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE EXCEPT WOULD HAVE PERMITTED CONGRESS TO WAIVE THE PROVISIONS BY LAW ANY YEAR FOR WHICH THE PRESIDENT NOTIFIED CONGRESS AND CONGRESS ADOPTED A JOINT RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THAT THE NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WAS PROJECTED TO EXCEED FOUR PERCENT, AND WOULD NOT HAVE REQUIRED A SUPERMAJORITY TO RAISE TAXES.)Failed64-363
House Vote 41 (1995)1995-01-26On Agreeing to the Amendment HJRES1: H.J.R.1 BY BARTON (R-TX) -- CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AMENDMENT BALANCED BUDGET (CONTRACT WITH AMERICA) (HOUSE AGREED TO THE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY REQUIRING THE ADOPTION OF A STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS WHICH ARE IN BALANCE; REQUIRING THE PRESIDENT TO SUBMIT A BALANCED BUDGET; REQUIRING A THREE-FIFTHS VOTE FOR DEFICIT SPENDING, INCREASES IN THE DEBT LIMIT; AND INCREASES IN TAX REVENUES; AND PROVIDING THAT A MAJORITY OF EACH HOUSE CAN WAIVE THE PROVISIONS IN CASE OF WAR OR A SERIOUS MILITARY THREAT AS DECLARED BY LAW.)Agreed to253-173
House Vote 40 (1995)1995-01-25On Agreeing to the resolution HCONRES17: Relating to Social Security with regards to the Balanced Budget AmendmentPassed412-18
House Vote 39 (1995)1995-01-25On Agreeing to the Resolution, as Amended HRES44: Providing for the consideration of H, Con, Res 17 and H,J, Res. 1; relating to the Balanced Budget AmendmentPassed255-172
House Vote 38 (1995)1995-01-25On Agreeing to the Amendment HRES44: (HOUSE AGREED TO THE SOLOMON CORRECTING AMENDMENT.)Agreed to253-176
House Vote 37 (1995)1995-01-25On Ordering the Previous Question HRES44: Providing for the consideration of H, Con, Res 17 and H,J, Res. 1; relating to the Balanced Budget AmendmentPassed233-196
House Vote 36 (1995)1995-01-24On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE OWENS AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO EXCLUDE FROM THE PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL MANDATE THAT PROTECTS THE HEALTH OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES.)Failed149-275
House Vote 35 (1995)1995-01-24On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE MALONEY AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO EXCLUDE FROM THE PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL MANDATE THAT PROTECTS THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN.)Failed161-261
House Vote 33 (1995)1995-01-24On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE KANJORSKI AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXCLUDE FROM THE PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL MANDATES THAT REQUIRE STATES TO MAINTAIN A NATIONAL DATABASE FOR TRACKING CHILD MOLESTERS, CHILD ABUSERS, PERSONS CONVICTED OF SEX CRIMES, THOSE UNDER A RESTRAINING ORDER OR THOSE FAILING TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT.)Failed172-255
House Vote 32 (1995)1995-01-24On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE AGREED TO THE BECERRA AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT EXCLUDES FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE BILL ANY FEDERAL MANDATES THAT ALLOW DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF AGE.)Agreed to416-1
House Vote 30 (1995)1995-01-24On Approving the Journal (HOUSE APPROVED THE JOURNAL OF MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995.)Passed278-135
House Vote 29 (1995)1995-01-23Leave for Committees to Sit for Balance of the Week (HOUSE AGREED TO THE ARMEY MOTION MAKING IN ORDER THAT ALL COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES BE PERMITTED TO SIT DURING THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE UNDER THE FIVE-MINUTE RULE ON MONDAY, JANUARY 23, 1995 AND THE BALANCE OF THE WEEK.)Passed232-187
House Vote 28 (1995)1995-01-23On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SPRATT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT FROM PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL LAW THAT REGULATES THE GENERATION, TRANSPORTATION, STORAGE, OR DISPOSAL OF TOXIC, HAZARDOUS, OR RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES.)Failed161-263
House Vote 27 (1995)1995-01-23On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE SANDERS EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT FROM PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL MANDATE THAT ESTABLISHES MINIMUM LABOR PROTECTION STANDARDS SUCH AS CHILD LABOR LAWS AND THE MINIMUM WAGE.)Failed161-263
House Vote 26 (1995)1995-01-23On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE GENE GREEN OF TEXAS EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXCLUDE FROM PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL LAWS THAT REGULATE THE LICENSING, CONSTRUCTION, OR OPERATION OF NUCLEAR REACTORS, OR THE DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE.)Failed162-259
House Vote 25 (1995)1995-01-23On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE COLLINS OF ILLINOIS EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO LAWS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO AVIATION AND AIRPORT SECURITY.)Failed169-256
House Vote 24 (1995)1995-01-20ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENTS EN BLOC HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE TOWNS EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO EXISTING LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES THAT INVOLVE INTERSTATE MATTERS WHICH COULD IMPACT ON THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF RESIDENTS OF OTHER STATES.)Failed153-252
House Vote 23 (1995)1995-01-20On agreeing to the amendments en bloc HR5: (HOUSE REJECTED THE TAYLOR OF MISSISSIPPI EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT PROVISIONS WOULD NOT APPLY TO EXISTING LAWS AND REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS RESTRICTING TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF POLLUTANTS THAT MAY BE DISCHARGED INTO U.S. WATERS BY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS, FACTORIES, AND OTHER FACILITIES.)Failed173-249
House Vote 22 (1995)1995-01-20On Agreeing to the Amendment HR5: H.R.5 BY CLINGER (R-PA) -- UNFUNDED MANDATE REFORM ACT OF 1995 (CONTRACT WITH AMERICA) (HOUSE REJECTED THE LOFGREN AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT CONGRESS NOT IMPOSE ANY FEDERAL MANDATE ON A STATE, INCLUDING A REQUIREMENT TO PAY MATCHING AMOUNTS, UNLESS THE STATE IS PROHIBITED BY FEDERAL LAW FROM REQUIRING, WITHOUT LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSENT, THAT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORM ACTIVITIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH A MANDATE.)Failed157-267
House Vote 21 (1995)1995-01-19On Agreeing to the Resolution HRES38: PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5; UNFUNDED MANDATE REFORM ACT OF 1995Passed350-71

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198 199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353